Legislature(2001 - 2002)
2001-05-01 House Journal
Full Journal pdf2001-05-01 House Journal Page 1430 HB 40 The following was read the second time: HOUSE BILL NO. 40 "An Act providing for the revocation of driving privileges by a court for a driver convicted of a violation of traffic laws in connection with a fatal motor vehicle or commercial motor vehicle accident; amending Rules 43 and 43.1, Alaska Rules of Administration; and providing for an effective date." with the: Journal Page JUD RPT CS(JUD) 1DP 4NR 822 FN1: (ADM); FN2: ZERO(ADM) 823 FN3: ZERO(LAW) 823 FIN RPT CS(FIN) 11DP 1109 FN1: (ADM); FN2: ZERO(ADM) 1109 FN3: ZERO(LAW) 1109 **The presence of Representative Scalzi was noted. Representative James moved and asked unanimous consent that the following committee substitute be adopted in lieu of the original bill: CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 40(FIN) (same title) There being no objection, it was so ordered. 2001-05-01 House Journal Page 1431 Representative James moved and asked unanimous consent that CSHB 40(FIN) be considered engrossed, advanced to third reading, and placed on final passage. There being no objection, it was so ordered. CSHB 40(FIN) was read the third time. **The presence of Representatives Wilson and Kott was noted. The question being: "Shall CSHB 40(FIN) pass the House?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 40(FIN) Third Reading Final Passage YEAS: 34 NAYS: 0 EXCUSED: 1 ABSENT: 5 Yeas: Berkowitz, Cissna, Coghill, Crawford, Croft, Davies, Dyson, Fate, Foster, Green, Guess, Halcro, Harris, Hayes, Hudson, James, Joule, Kohring, Kookesh, Kott, Lancaster, McGuire, Meyer, Morgan, Moses, Murkowski, Ogan, Porter, Rokeberg, Scalzi, Stevens, Whitaker, Williams, Wilson Excused: Masek Absent: Bunde, Chenault, Kapsner, Kerttula, Mulder And so, CSHB 40(FIN) passed the House. Representative James moved and asked unanimous consent that the roll call on the passage of the bill be considered the roll call on the court rule change. There being no objection, it was so ordered. Representative James moved and asked unanimous consent that the roll call on the passage of the bill be considered the roll call on the effective date clause. There being no objection, it was so ordered. CSHB 40(FIN) was referred to the Chief Clerk for engrossment.